Yep and they still insist the site is online. Perhaps SBR can contact WC directly or is a formal complaint required? Here's my chat with them from 40 minutes ago:


Please wait for a site operator to respond.
You are now chatting with 'Cesar'
[B]Cesar: [/B]Hello. How may I assist you?
[B]tom: [/B]Is there a problem with your site?
[B]Cesar: [/B]Currently no Tom
[B]tom: [/B]It's been down the last two full days.
[B]Cesar: [/B]I'll ask our IT department to check on it
[B]tom: [/B]So you are not aware of any problems with your website? Could you check with a supervisor now?
[B]Cesar: [/B]They...

info:[COLOR=green] Hi! Welcome to BetOnline! How can I help you?[/COLOR]
info:[COLOR=green] You are now chatting with Manny Campbell[/COLOR]
info:[COLOR=green] Your Issue ID for this chat is LTK494022949011X. Please record it in case of pending issue.[/COLOR]
Manny Campbell: Thank you for contacting BetOnline Live Chat Service. How may I assist you today?
Joe :[COLOR=red] The check you sent me was no good![/COLOR]
Manny Campbell: Could you please verify me the account number
Joe:[COLOR=red] xxxxxxxx[/COLOR]
Manny Campbell: okay please verify the amount of the check
Joe :[COLOR=red] 2500[/COLOR]
Manny Campbell: thank you
Joe:[COLOR=red] still there?[/COLOR]
Manny Campbell: You deposited the check into your bank's account?
Joe:[COLOR=red] Yes when I received it Monday--10 days later...[/COLOR]

Yes, [B]common sense would have been for DSI to process the first withdrawal[/B], but they appear eager to remedy this. Common sense also dictates that if you make additional withdrawals, you don't overbet what should be your remaining balance. OP created the confusion that led to this situation, but takes zero responsibility for it. He compounds his mistake by making an absurd allegation that DSI doesn't pay and suggesting all "SBR Pros" that disagree with him are shilling for DSI (a Book I'm not using currently). Funny thing is that the OP could easily be an SBR Pro too if he would take one minute to register his DSI account (or any other sponsor Book he plays at). Perhaps his paranoia prevents him from doing that. At any rate, it's all moot because DSI will pay him, just like they do everyone else--it's the main reason they're A+.

Same here. Good Luck! [URL="http://membersb.heritagesports.com/ALPendingWagers.asp#"][U]37742635-1[/U][/URL]10/20/2011 3:42PMSpread 384.00300.00Football - 304 UAB +17½ -128 buying 1 for Game [URL="http://membersb.heritagesports.com/ALPendingWagers.asp#"][U]37748254-1[/U][/URL]10/20/2011 6:28PMSpread 150.00157.50Football - 303 Central Florida -8½ +105 for 2nd Half

Discussion: [URL="http://forum.sbrforum.com/sportsbooks-amp-industry/1340341-heritage-get-out-ht-promo-tonight.html"]A Response To Heritage Get out at HT promo tonight[/URL]

FREE PAYOUT METHODS (1 every 30 calendar days)

Discussion: [URL="http://forum.sbrforum.com/sportsbooks-amp-industry/1315975-decent-usa-outs-can-we-get-list-withdrawal-costs-one-thread.html"]A Response To Decent USA outs. Can we get a list of withdrawal costs in one thread?[/URL]

I still don't understand your pro scam/anti scam classifications. Wouldn't it be less confusing to say Pro EZ vs Pro Cory? My listing of 30 SBR posters paid does in no way excuses what did or did not happen in the Cory case. It does show another side of EZ that many are unwilling to acknowlege--EZ has consistently paid us "lunch box guys" (many of whom accumulated signigicant winnings over time--not exactly the chump change you suggest).

Even more interesting is the fact that I can find only one poster claiming to be stiffed. And this...

Nice job of clipping my quote to suit your purpose, Quackmore. I stated that I never supported EZ's position concerning Cory. Obviously I provided supporting conclusive evidence that EZ does in fact pay-- about 30 different SBR posters confirming payment now. As far as keeping an open mind, I think I have. I disagree with the cloak and dagger way RX decided the case. The proof was not conclusive as they presented it. Doesn't make Cory innocent, just not proven guilty. I also disagree with SBR allowing a scamster/spamster to repeat lie after lie for 5 months. If Cory would have stuck to EZ didn't pay him, I would have left him alone. But no, he chose to spam false info with SBR's blessing. Unlike you, I don't see everything as either Black or White. There were plenty of gray areas in the EZ matter. Between EZ, Cory, SBR and RX there are no innocent parties in my mind. BTW, I do agree with one thing you brought up--time to return to our lives.

Discussion: [URL="http://forum.sbrforum.com/sportsbooks-amp-industry/1268593-the-new-easysports-thread-where-anti-scammers-pro-scammers-collide.html"]A Response To The New Easysports thread! Where anti scammers and pro scammers collide[/URL]

I get this email from BOL that they've set up an account for me with a free $500 FP to try their Book. It says a 10x RO is required plus a matching deposit. No problem, [B]but you have to deposit first[/B]. Usually these offers allow you to use the FP and win up to a certain level--AND THEN do the matching deposit. It defeats the purpose of supposedly letting you try out their software if the deposit is required first. Made no sense to me so I used their live chat to get my...

I do agree with this in principle, and I back the bettor much more often than not. However, you seem to only support the "free flow of info" when it agrees with your opinion. [B] I have never been stiffed by 5D, BOL[/B] (a reference to this thread in case I'm accused of hi-jacking this thread), [B]and believe it or not-- EZ Street Sports.[/B] I play at all three and am very satisfied with each and every one of them. But when I report payout after payout from EZ, you label me a" fool" for supporting them. Try to allow for an opinion that may differ from yours, especially if it's coming from someone's actual experience with the Book in question. Said my peace, and I'm done with the "bashing" you actually initiated. Let's leave it that, ok? :cheers:

Discussion: [URL="http://forum.sbrforum.com/sportsbooks-amp-industry/1169704-i-lied-about-my-betonline-account.html"]A Response To I lied about my BetOnline account[/URL]

For those that bet 1st half baseball, how valuable is a 1/2 run in first 5 inning betting? Assume two subsets:

Low scoring with [B]4 runs or less scored[/B], what % of games are tied after five innings?

High scoring with [B]5 runs or more scored[/B], what % of games are tied after five innings?

Thanks in advance, HH